Inclusion: The Pros and Cons
References
Board of Education, Sacremento City Unified School District v. Rachel Holland, 786 F. Supp. 874 (E.D.Cal. 1992).
Boyd, V. (1992). Creating a text for change. Issues ... about Change, 2(2). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
CEC policy on inclusive schools and community settings. (1993). Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(4) (Supplement).
Cohen, O. (1994, April 20). 'Inclusion' should not include deaf students. Education Week, p. 35.
Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education, 874 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
Erwin, E. J. (1993, winter). The philosophy and status of inclusion. Envision: A publication of The Lighthouse National Center for Vision and Child Development, pp.1, 3-4.
Greer v. Rome City School District, 950 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1991). Heubert, J. (1994, July/August). Assumptions underlie arguments about inclusion. Harvard Education Newsletter, p. 4.
Hord, S. (1991). Leadership: An imperative for successful change. Issues ... about Change, 1(2). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Kids count data book: State profiles of child well-being. (1994). Greenwich, CT: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Leo, J. (1994, June 27). Mainstreaming's 'Jimmy problem.' U. S. News & World Report, p. 22.
Lieberman, L. M. (1992). Preserving special education...for those who need it. In W. Stainback, & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1992). Achieving full inclusion: Placing the student at the center of educational reform. In W. Stainback, & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lyon, & Vaughn. (1994). Inclusion: Can it work for students with learning disabilities? Unpublished manuscript.
McCaul, E.J., Donaldson, G.A., Jr., Coladarci, T., & Davis, W.E. (1992). Consequences of dropping out of school: Findings from high school and beyond. Journal of Educational Research, 85 (4), 198-207.
McGregor, G. (Fall, 1993). Inclusion: A powerful pedagogy. Front Line, 2(1), 8-10.
National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992, October). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. (Report of NASBE Study Group on Special Education). Alexandria, VA: Author.
Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School, 995 F.2d 1204 (3rd Cir. 1993).
O'Neil, J. (1993, November). Inclusive education gains adherents. ASCD Update, 35(9) , pp. 1, 3-4.
Reynolds, M. C. (1988, winter). Past, present, and future of school integration. Minnesota UAP Impact, 1(2), 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Affiliated Program on Developmental Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 081)
Reynolds, M. C. (1988). A reaction to the JLD special series on the regular education initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(6), 352-356.
Reynolds, M. C., & Birch, J. W. (1988). Adaptive mainstreaming: A primer for teachers and principals (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
Ringer, L., & Kerr, S. (1988, winter). Integration-the legal imperative. Minnesota UAP Impact, 1(2), 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Affiliated Program on Developmental Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 081)
Rogers, J. (1993, May). The inclusion revolution. Research Bulletin, no. 11. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan, Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research.
Sailor, W. (1989). The educational, social, and vocational integration of students with the most severe disabilities. In D. K. Lipsky & A. Gartner (Eds.), Beyond separate education (pp. 53-74). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Sklaroff, S. (1994, January 12). A.F.T. urges halt to 'full inclusion' movement. Education Week, p. 7.
Skrtic, T. M. (1991, May). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61(2), 148-206.
Soffer, R. (March/April, 1994). Inclusion-It's not what you think. ATPE News (Association of Texas Professional Educators), pp. 24, 28.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1988, winter). The role of research in integration. Minnesota UAP Impact, 1(2), 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Affiliated Program on Developmental Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 081)
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., and Bunch, G. (1989). A rationale for the merger of regular and special education. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & Forest, M. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., and Bunch, G. (1989). Introduction and historical background. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & Forest, M. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Staub, D., & Peck, C. A. (1994-1995). What are the outcomes for non-disabled students? Educational Leadership, 52(4), pp. 36-40.
Tompkins, R., & Deloney, P. (1994). Rural students at risk in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Tornillo, P. (1994, March 6). A lightweight fad bad for our schools? Orlando Sentinel.
Will, M. (1986, November). Educating students with learning problems-a shared responsibility. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
Winzer, M. A. (1993). The history of special education: From isolation to integration. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Next Page: Credits & Disclaimers
