|

It
is afternoon in one of the many small towns in the Southwest.
School is still in session for the afternoon, so it is quiet.
The lunch rush at the Dairy Queen has slowed down to a couple
of old-timers talking about the weather and the price of livestock
at last Saturdays auction. A few businesses cling to
life on Main Street. The nearest large grocery store, medical
center, or movie rental place is 40 miles away. A brood of
wild turkeys struts down Main Street. The turkeys blink at
a lone car making its way around the corner.
According
to the school principal, This is a good place to raise
kids, but we cant keep them here; no way to make a living,
you know.
Most
of the parents commute to a larger city in the region to work;
everyone farms or ranches a little.
Communities
like the one described evolved to support the Southwestern
regions thriving agricultural and petroleum businesses.
For twenty years, however, these rural schools and communities
in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas have
been challenged by corporate farming and ranching, the exodus
of industry to Mexico and Asia, and the centralization of
retail trade in larger towns and cities. Rural communities
have also faced reduced state and federal aid for their schools
and pressure to consolidate their school districts. The result
for many communities has been a diminished quality of life
and limited futures for their young people.
|
This
is a good
place
to raise
kids, but we
can't keep them
here; no way to
make a living.
|
|
Rural
schools and communities need each other if they are to be
sustainable and viable. A communitys quality of life
cannot be separated from its schoolsschools are often
the largest employer in the community and the communitys
center for social, cultural, and recreation activities.
Rural
schools and communities throughout the U.S. are discovering
that working together in partnerships not only improves overall
quality of life, but makes the best use of scarce resources
and improves opportunity for young people. Success stories
include student-run companies, environmental projects, arts
programs, and tutoring projects (see the following story What
Schools and Communities Have Accomplished Together).
The Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL) is
helping to establish such partnerships in its region through
the Rural Development Collaborative Action Team project, or
RD CAT. With RD CAT, SEDL links school and community development
using two strategies to address specific economic, social,
and educational conditions facing rural families by:
- building
local capacity to work in school/community teams through
teaching the Collaborative Action Team (CAT) process; and
- working
with these local teams to plan and carry out activities,
such as service learning and entrepreneurial training, that
link school instructional programs and community development
projects.
Building
capacity enhances the potential of local community residents
to solve their own problems and work together to efficiently
manage resources for school improvement and community revitalization.
However, rural communities may not have the resources for
effective local capacity building.
Although
residents may be enthusiastic about improving their schools
and community and may be willing to devote time to making
changes, they may lack the technical or organizational skills
needed to build a team, make plans and maintain the momentum
to carry out the project. This is where SEDLs staff
and Collaborative Action Team (CAT) process can help rural
communities.
SEDL
assists local teams to develop strong partnerships by teaching
training and coaching. Participants in CAT projects indicate
that this assistance provides team-building skills to help
the partners bond and build a common vision.
A
school nurse who participated in a collaborative action team
in New Mexico says, Without this [SEDL training] we
would have really been struggling. They gave us the foundation
and the building blocks so we can continue growing. And they
helped us celebrate our successes.
Notes
a parent from Violet, LA, a fishing community south of New
Orleans that participated in the CAT process:
At
the beginning some people were saying, Well, why would
we need help? They were kind of skeptical [about getting
involved with CAT], but now looking back theyve said,
Well were glad we did because its really
helped bring the school together, through communication
and with some ideas they brought to us. That has really helped
the students, the community, the parents, and the business
people come together.
The
CAT process uses a three-dimensional approach: team building,
team planning, and momentum generation. These three dimensions
help members become a collaborative, cohesive team while developing
and implementing a plan for making productive changes within
the school and community. Through guided activities, community
members experience and practice consensus-building skills,
effective communication, and shared leadership and decision-making.
SEDL staff members also help the collaborative action teams
evaluate their activities and measure their successes.
Team
Building. Team building is the process of how teams
work together as a unit. The activities of team building allow
the group to develop skills for exploring and eventually settling
on ways of working together effectively. During the process
of building a team, the group will find common ground, initiate
networking opportunities, encourage new individual roles and
responsibilities, and practice collaborative teamwork.
According
to SEDL program manager Catherine Jordan, who oversees the
RD CAT projects, The CAT process gives people some structured
opportunities to begin listening to each other, to learn to
respect other perspectives, and to build trust. In small rural
communities where everybody knows everybody and may have long-standing
prejudices about each other, the CAT process can be a valuable
tool for establishing trust and respect necessary for communities
to grow and change together for the common good.
Team
Planning.
This is the nuts and bolts of defining and implementing the
projects that address the concerns of the school and community
identified by the team. This includes agreeing on a vision
and a mission, setting goals and objectives, determining roles
and responsibilities, and outlining tasks and timelines to
accomplish the work.
Momentum
Generation. For some communities, this is the most
difficult part of the CAT process. Momentum is created when
the team carries out tasks and moves forward toward achieving
established goals.
According
to SEDL program specialist Jerry Elder, who trains members
of the CATs to serve as facilitators, We discovered
that in collaborative action teams where all their time was
devoted to just action planningsuch as developing goals
and objectivesand where they saw no results, the team
membership dropped. On the other hand, in CAT sites where
they developed some intermediate short-term projects, participation
remained steady. These early short-term projects generated
energy and enthusiasm of members that were needed for the
development of on-going efforts.
It
is important to note that some of these short-term projects
were fairly simple, such as refurbishing a sign in front of
the school to announce activities or holding a family picnic
to increase parent involvement. Successfully completing small
projects can help build team confidence.
|