SEDL Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
Benefits2 Rural student entrepreneurs: Linking commerce and community
Previous Page Next Page

Image of girl in library

Students learn academic, work, and citizenship skills in real-world settings; for example, by helping to staff the community library or community health clinic.

Changes in perspective

Expanding ideas about the school’s function in the community. A first requirement is to reconsider the role of the school within a rural community. The "factory" model of institutional operation–a model that has dominated business, government, and education for most of this century–has encouraged a rigid separation of functions. Schools, once the heart of many small towns, have largely disengaged themselves from a broader role as community and social center. Bruce Miller reports that, in reviewing some 250 articles and reports on rural community development, "I was struck by the conspicuous absence of schools as collaborative partners in their communities" (p. 96). To support community-based education, it’s necessary to reclaim the school’s role as an integral part of the entire community’s existence.

Rethinking the nature of teaching and learning. It’s also necessary to expand one’s ideas about the purpose and nature of schooling itself. Miller and Hahn (1997) observe that school-community partnerships and community-based learning "are not generally viewed as traditional elements of schooling" (p. 71).

Community-based education, as we have described it, presumes that schools have an important role in helping students to become effective community members. From this perspective, the goal of education is not merely to convey a body of knowledge within specific subject areas; it is also to help students to become "creative, productive, critical citizens" (Foxfire Fund, 1998, p. 5).

Ideas about the appropriate methods of teaching need to change as well. Traditionally, education is classroom—and textbook—bound; a student’s measure of success is a test score. Community-based instruction, though it matches the characteristics of what we know about the most effective ways of teaching, is messier and more complicated than this traditional model. Subject matter isn’t easily segregated, the learning environment isn’t rigidly controlled, and knowledge develops as much from student dialogue and problem-solving as it does from teacher or text. Is it schooling when one student tutors another? Or when students collect samples from local streams and wells to monitor water quality? Or when students help to remodel the kitchen of an elderly resident? The answer is a resounding yes–and not just in terms of citizenship and work skills. With careful planning and reinforcement, students will learn academic subject matter as well, and most teachers find the task of engaging their classes in subject matter learning to be much easier when students see an immediate use for their academic knowledge.

PREP
Previous Page Next Page
   

SEDL online accessibilityCopyright 2000 Southwest Educational Development Laboratory