|

Problems and challenges are inevitable when implementing
a comprehensive school reform program, no matter how well a program
is planned. By monitoring and checking progress throughout the implementation
process, we're able to identify problems, challenges and concerns,
and address them quickly. Catching problems early ensures a smoother,
more successful implementation and can result in an improved program.
Monitoring and checking progress can also serve as a source of encouragement
to teachers—they will be reminded that changes are being made, that
the school is progressing toward its vision of comprehensive school
reform.
Checking progress can be accomplished in a variety
of ways—formal and informal; qualitative and quantitative. Dennis
Sparks explains how principals can incorporate different methods
of monitoring and checking progress:
|
Having the opportunity to visit other teachers on their
grade level, implementing the same program can be a very,
very powerful kind of assistance to teachers. Shirley
Hord,
SEDL Program Manager
|
|
"Principals can check progress in a number of ways—some
of them informal and some of them more formalized. They can be visible
in the hallways and in the classrooms of the school by doing walk-throughs
of classrooms or more extensive classroom visitations so that they
have a sense of the challenges teachers face as they try to implement
new strategies. They can be looking at student work with teachers
to see if the quality of the work is changing as a result of the
new approaches being used. They can look at data from across classrooms—formalized
data that may be in the form of standardized tests or attendance
information, for example."
He stresses, "Data are most useful when principals
and teachers discuss it and make sense of it together. They should
look at it as trend data so that they can go back several years
and see what it used to be like and what it's like today. Schools
that are most successful, I have found, are schools that have had
some training in data analysis and working together around that
data. Because very often it's quite difficult to understand what
it's about and what it means. So some training and lots of discussion
among teachers with the principal is necessary to make sense of
what it means and what it indicates the school needs to work on
next to realize its vision."
Like Sparks, Shirley Hord emphasizes the value of
school leaders informally checking progress by consistently visiting
classrooms and touching base with teachers. She says, "First of
all, this lets teachers know that the administrators or leaders
in the building are interested in what they are doing. And, secondly,
it lets them know that this program they are trying to implement,
the new work they are trying hard to do, is being appreciated and
is a high priority for the school leadership."
Planning for evaluation or checking progress should
be included as part of the planning process for your CSR program.
Checking progress throughout program implementation in a planned
systematic way could be considered formative or process evaluation.
With formative evaluation we check our progress toward expected
outcomes by asking questions such as "What is working?" "What should
be improved?" How should it be changed?" Assessments such as surveys,
interviews, observations, and checklists can be used to develop
formative evaluations.
SEDL Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating
Officer Joan Buttram refers to the formative evaluation as an early
warning device. She explains the importance of having an evaluation
plan in place early on: "You won't reach your end results if things
that were supposed to happen along the way didn't happen. Uncovering
problems as they arise and addressing the problems promptly can
make or break your final results. The evaluation helps ensure that
everything is being carried out as it should be."
"All too often administrators feel they intuitively
know what's going on in the CSR program, but they can be wrong,"
Buttram reports. "They often only talk to a certain group of people
to get feedback or they only see a few parts of the program being
implemented. A good evaluation plan can provide an overall view
of how the program is being implemented."
A final part of the monitoring and checking progress
is to put the findings into use. This means creating opportunities
to discuss findings with staff and decide if changes should be made.
It means celebrating successes and learning from mistakes. It also
means appropriately sharing findings with stakeholders outside of
the school building—the superintendent, the school board, parents,
and community. Keeping stakeholders informed and interested can
bolster the support for your CSR program.
Monitoring and Checking Progress: How Did Sierra
Vista and Sunrise Measure Up?
One reason Sierra Vista's reform program was thriving
was that Ms. Martinez regularly led her staff in looking at student
data. Sierra Vista teachers seemed to enjoy studying data and determining
what progress their students were making. Ms. Martinez also demonstrated
how important she thought the teachers' work was by visiting the
classrooms and following up with teachers regarding their instruction.
She served as a valuable support system for her staff and set the
tone for the entire school reform program.
On the other hand, Ms. Smith had not begun to promote
the study of student data on a regular basis nor did Sunrise teachers
have organized discussions about the informal indicators of school
change, such as student attitudes or how certain students were struggling.
Due to this lack of reflection, the staff not only missed out on
seeing what adjustments to their program should be made, but also
missed what may have been valuable indicators of progress in their
school reform program—progress that the consultant from the model
developer's office saw easily.
Glossary of School Reform Terms
Facilitative leaderA leader who makes it possible
for the school to move forward in the change or reform process
by guiding and supporting faculty and staff and by instituting
policies and procedures which help them move through the process
and meet the needs of all students. There may be numerous
facilitative leaders throughout the reform process and these
leaders may include others in addition to principals and administrators.
School contextEnvironment in which the school
operates that includes two dimensions: 1) the ecology of the
school, which includes resources, policies and rules, size
of school, physical arrangement of school; and 2) the culture
of the school, which includes attitudes, beliefs, school norms,
and relationships within the school and between the school
and community.
Comprehensive School Reform (CSR)An approach
to school improvement where entire schools are redesigned
and revitalized with a focus on enhanced teaching and learning.
The key is the word comprehensive; the school reform plans
are not piecemeal but integrate all factors that influence
teaching and learning.
Professional Learning Community (PLC)An organizational
arrangement in a school where teachers and administrators
establish collegial relationships to continuously seek and
share learning and then act on what they learn in order to
enhance their effectiveness as professionals. In a PLC, the
principal shares leadershipand thus power and authoritythrough
inviting staff input in decision making. There is also collective
learning among staff and application of that learning to solutions
that address students needs. Research literature has
shown that effective PLCs also have a shared vision that is
developed from the staffs unwavering commitment to students
learning and is consistently articulated and referenced in
the staffs work. Effective PLCs also provide coaching,
support, assistance, and feedback for teachers.
|
|