SEDL Home Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
     
  Strategies for Success: Implementing a Comprehensive School Reform Program
Previous Page Next Page
 

Strategy #5: Monitoring and Checking Progress

Problems and challenges are inevitable when implementing a comprehensive school reform program, no matter how well a program is planned. By monitoring and checking progress throughout the implementation process, we're able to identify problems, challenges and concerns, and address them quickly. Catching problems early ensures a smoother, more successful implementation and can result in an improved program. Monitoring and checking progress can also serve as a source of encouragement to teachers—they will be reminded that changes are being made, that the school is progressing toward its vision of comprehensive school reform.

Checking progress can be accomplished in a variety of ways—formal and informal; qualitative and quantitative. Dennis Sparks explains how principals can incorporate different methods of monitoring and checking progress:

“Having the opportunity to visit other teachers on their grade level, implementing the same program can be a very, very powerful kind of assistance to teachers.” —Shirley Hord,
SEDL Program Manager

 

"Principals can check progress in a number of ways—some of them informal and some of them more formalized. They can be visible in the hallways and in the classrooms of the school by doing walk-throughs of classrooms or more extensive classroom visitations so that they have a sense of the challenges teachers face as they try to implement new strategies. They can be looking at student work with teachers to see if the quality of the work is changing as a result of the new approaches being used. They can look at data from across classrooms—formalized data that may be in the form of standardized tests or attendance information, for example."

He stresses, "Data are most useful when principals and teachers discuss it and make sense of it together. They should look at it as trend data so that they can go back several years and see what it used to be like and what it's like today. Schools that are most successful, I have found, are schools that have had some training in data analysis and working together around that data. Because very often it's quite difficult to understand what it's about and what it means. So some training and lots of discussion among teachers with the principal is necessary to make sense of what it means and what it indicates the school needs to work on next to realize its vision."

Like Sparks, Shirley Hord emphasizes the value of school leaders informally checking progress by consistently visiting classrooms and touching base with teachers. She says, "First of all, this lets teachers know that the administrators or leaders in the building are interested in what they are doing. And, secondly, it lets them know that this program they are trying to implement, the new work they are trying hard to do, is being appreciated and is a high priority for the school leadership."

Planning for evaluation or checking progress should be included as part of the planning process for your CSR program. Checking progress throughout program implementation in a planned systematic way could be considered formative or process evaluation. With formative evaluation we check our progress toward expected outcomes by asking questions such as "What is working?" "What should be improved?" How should it be changed?" Assessments such as surveys, interviews, observations, and checklists can be used to develop formative evaluations.

SEDL Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer Joan Buttram refers to the formative evaluation as an early warning device. She explains the importance of having an evaluation plan in place early on: "You won't reach your end results if things that were supposed to happen along the way didn't happen. Uncovering problems as they arise and addressing the problems promptly can make or break your final results. The evaluation helps ensure that everything is being carried out as it should be."

"All too often administrators feel they intuitively know what's going on in the CSR program, but they can be wrong," Buttram reports. "They often only talk to a certain group of people to get feedback or they only see a few parts of the program being implemented. A good evaluation plan can provide an overall view of how the program is being implemented."

A final part of the monitoring and checking progress is to put the findings into use. This means creating opportunities to discuss findings with staff and decide if changes should be made. It means celebrating successes and learning from mistakes. It also means appropriately sharing findings with stakeholders outside of the school building—the superintendent, the school board, parents, and community. Keeping stakeholders informed and interested can bolster the support for your CSR program.

Monitoring and Checking Progress: How Did Sierra Vista and Sunrise Measure Up?

One reason Sierra Vista's reform program was thriving was that Ms. Martinez regularly led her staff in looking at student data. Sierra Vista teachers seemed to enjoy studying data and determining what progress their students were making. Ms. Martinez also demonstrated how important she thought the teachers' work was by visiting the classrooms and following up with teachers regarding their instruction. She served as a valuable support system for her staff and set the tone for the entire school reform program.

On the other hand, Ms. Smith had not begun to promote the study of student data on a regular basis nor did Sunrise teachers have organized discussions about the informal indicators of school change, such as student attitudes or how certain students were struggling. Due to this lack of reflection, the staff not only missed out on seeing what adjustments to their program should be made, but also missed what may have been valuable indicators of progress in their school reform program—progress that the consultant from the model developer's office saw easily.

Glossary of School Reform Terms

Facilitative leader—A leader who makes it possible for the school to move forward in the change or reform process by guiding and supporting faculty and staff and by instituting policies and procedures which help them move through the process and meet the needs of all students. There may be numerous facilitative leaders throughout the reform process and these leaders may include others in addition to principals and administrators.

School context—Environment in which the school operates that includes two dimensions: 1) the ecology of the school, which includes resources, policies and rules, size of school, physical arrangement of school; and 2) the culture of the school, which includes attitudes, beliefs, school norms, and relationships within the school and between the school and community.

Comprehensive School Reform (CSR)—An approach to school improvement where entire schools are redesigned and revitalized with a focus on enhanced teaching and learning. The key is the word comprehensive; the school reform plans are not piecemeal but integrate all factors that influence teaching and learning.

Professional Learning Community (PLC)—An organizational arrangement in a school where teachers and administrators establish collegial relationships to continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn in order to enhance their effectiveness as professionals. In a PLC, the principal shares leadership—and thus power and authority—through inviting staff input in decision making. There is also collective learning among staff and application of that learning to solutions that address students’ needs. Research literature has shown that effective PLCs also have a shared vision that is developed from the staff’s unwavering commitment to students’ learning and is consistently articulated and referenced in the staff’s work. Effective PLCs also provide coaching, support, assistance, and feedback for teachers.

  Strategies for Success: Implementing a Comprehensive School Reform Program
Revious Page Next Page
 
   
Copyright 2000 Southwest Educational Development Laboratory   Web Accessibility Symbol