|
SEDL Letter |
Putting Reading First |
The Right Questions Can Improve Student Thinking and Learning
The Right Questions Can Improve Student Thinking and Learning |
by Leslie Blair |
Questioning Strategies | Related Resources & Products "Basic literacy is, perhaps, best characterized as a read and recall, write neatly, and spell accurately, model of performance," write Richard Allington and Peter Johnston in a recent report. But they continue, "thoughtful literacy, on the other hand, is characterized by students who can read, write, and think in the complex and critical ways needed in a post-industrial democratic society." SEDL program associate Jill Slack leads questioning training in New Orleans. "Questioning and thinking go hand in hand," Slack says. For the past several years SEDL program associate Jill Slack has been training educators throughout SEDL's Southeast Comprehensive Assistance Center (SECAC) region to use more effective questioning techniques in their classrooms to increase their students' level of thinking and to help them to acquire thoughtful literacy as defined by Allington and Johnston. "Questioning and thinking go hand in hand," Slack says. Effective questioning also can be an assessment tool for teachers, helping them determine what their students know and don't know. Slack talked about the questioning approach in an interview with SEDL Letter on April 10, 2002, in New Orleans, where she conducted a one-day training session for New Orleans Public Schools K-3 reading-intervention teachers who are involved in SECAC's Reading Success Network (RSN). "Questioning is one of the missing pieces in teacher training," Slack says. "Teachers often ask closed-ended questions that don't allow the students to demonstrate their level of knowledge or lack of knowledge." She explains, "The quality of response is affected by the quality of the question's content and how the question is asked. The pacing of the question also comes into play." Through practice sessions, workshop participants learned how difficult it was to ask questions that solicit a response other than yes or no. They found they habitually began questions with such stems as, "Do you think . . . ?" or "Did you notice . . . ?" that could be answered yes or no. Instead, Slack guides the teachers in asking questions that demonstrate a student's knowledge and comprehension and allow the teachers to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate. As an alternative, a teacher might ask, "What did you notice . . . ?" or "What do you think . . . ?" New Orleans Public Schools K-3 reading intervention teachers Sonya Carter (left) and Judith Jastal work on their questioning techniques at a SECAC workshop.  Slack breaks questions down into two groups: core questions and processing questions. Core questions cue and direct the classroom's thought experiences and focus on observation and recall, comparison, grouping, labeling, classifying, sequencing, predicting, and inferring. Slack encourages the teachers to take a student's response to a deeper level by using the student's response to form their next question, which likely will be a processing question. Processing questions narrow the focus of discussion, elicit a variety of responses from different students, provide students with an opportunity to give evidence for their ideas or information, or help students create relationships between evidence and statements. "Using processing questions means we have to be good listeners," Slack says. Slack also encourages teachers to make questioning a common part of their classrooms. "Students fear questions and this can stop learning. Generally speaking, we ask a student a second question only when we consider the first answer wrong. Because of this, students have a trained aversion to the second question." Further questioning can help teachers determine how deeply a child is thinking. "You don't know exactly at what level a child is thinking until you ask follow-up questions." She notes a student's answer could indicate a certain level of analysis, but if that student heard the response the day before, she may actually be at a lower knowledge level. By probing, a teacher would be able tell how well the student truly understands the material. SECAC's questioning workshop includes guidance in preparing lesson plans to help teachers anticipate what types of responses learners may give to core questions and the types of processing questions that the teacher should be prepared to ask to direct classroom conversation and deepen thinking. For the RSN training in New Orleans, teachers prepared lesson plans related to books they might actually use in their elementary school classrooms. The workshop also includes time to practice coding a transcript of classroom conversation. This helps teachers refine what types of questioning they should use in different circumstances. To hone their questioning skills, Slack encourages teachers to audiotape classroom discussions. Teachers can then code transcripts and interpret classroom conversation to determine at which points in the conversation they should have used certain types of questions or redirected the conversation to encourage more critical thinking. SECAC's questioning training is usually presented to districts and schools in multiple sessions over a period of time. This allows teachers an opportunity to return to their classrooms, practice using the newly learned questioning techniques, and then return for additional coaching and training, during which time they can share how they used the techniques and receive additional feedback. The April RSN session was unusual because it was only one day of training, instead of the several days of training that Slack prefers. Teachers, nevertheless, found the training useful. Kathleen Theodore, a teacher at McDonogh No. 15 Creative Arts Magnet School in New Orleans, notes that since the training her lesson plans "are clearly focused on the questioning techniques that I need to increase student involvement and learning. I am very conscious not only of how I phrase a question, but also of the questions I ask at a particular moment." Theodore says the staff development teacher and principal at McDonogh are now interested in implementing the questioning strategies schoolwide through staff development activities and school improvement planning. | Effective Core Questions Effective core questions cue and direct the thought experiences of the classroom discourse. Core questions should be - Clear -- Core questions should use language that students understand.
- Focused -- Core questions should identify content and thinking skill.
- Open -- Core questions should use words that provide learners with opportunities to state complete responses and allow for diverse responses.
Examples of core questions include these: - What do you notice about the ____________? (Observing)
- Tell me what you remember about ____________. (Recalling)
- In what ways are ____________ and ____________ alike? (Comparing)
- What differences do you find between ____________ and ____________? (Contrasting)
- Which of the items on the list go together for some reason? (Grouping)
- Based on the reasons for the groups, what would be some appropriate names or phrases? (Labeling)
- Which of the examples belong in the ____________ group? (Classifying)
- What is the order of the following information based on (criterion)? (Sequencing)
- What are the causes of ____________? (Inferring causes)
- What do you think is true about ____________? (Inferring quality)
- What do you think will happen as a result of ____________? (Predicting)
| | Types of Processing Questions - Refocusing questions are used if learners are not doing the kind of thinking initiated or are talking off subject.
- Clarifying questions are used if learners' responses are unclear or if the teacher feels more appropriate language could be used to express the idea. They are also used to help learners define words and bring additional meaning to the ideas they have expressed.
- Verifying questions are used to encourage learners to cite or provide additional evidence for their ideas or information.
- Learners verify information through personal experience, stating what authorities say is true, or using a principle or generalization that exemplifies the information.
- Redirecting questions are used to enhance learner-learner interaction. Used to elicit a variety of responses from different students.
- Narrowing-the-focus questions are used to limit the content learners talk about.
- Supporting questions are used to help learners make relationships between and among evidence statements.
Examples of Processing Questions Refocusing - What makes you say ____________?
- You are noticing ways in which the ____________ are alike. In what ways are they different? Clarifying
- What do you mean by ____________?
- Draw that for me.
- Define ____________.
- What are you referring to when you say ____________?
Verifying - How do you know ____________?
- When or where have you experienced this before?
- Give me an example of ____________.
Redirecting - Someone else tell me in what ways we can group ____________.
- What other predictions can we make about ____________?
Narrowing the focus - What do you notice about ____________?
- Tell me more about ____________.
Supporting - What is makes you say ____________ is an example of ____________?
- On what basis did you order these?
- What makes you say ____________ caused ____________?
- What makes you say ____________ is the result of ____________?
- What is the reason for thinking ____________ will result in ____________?
| Questioning Strategies An Annotated Bibliography by Jill Slack Beyer, B. 1997. Improving student thinking: A comprehensive approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. In this book, Beyer provides instruction in specific teaching skills integrated into subject matter teaching. Features a practical, how-to-do-it emphasis. Full of sample materials, explanations and examples for creating thoughtful questions and classroom environments, as well as how to encourage and guide student thinking and provide opportunities to think. Collins, C. & J. M. Mangieri. 1992. Teaching thinking: An agenda for the 21st century. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools. This book provides practical ideas and strategies for the teaching thinking, along with findings from research on teaching thinking in diverse populations. Dantonio, M. 1990. How can we create thinkers? Questioning strategies that work for teachers. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service. This manual demonstrates how to ask questions that prompt students to focus, expand, and support their answers. Includes specific and practical steps for developing a successful questioning-skills training program. Dantonio, M. & P. Beisenherz. 2000. Learning to question, questioning to learn: Developing effective teacher questioning practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. This resource introduces a strategy that develops and refines student conceptual understandings through instructional conversations. Examines the critical issues of productive questioning using vignettes, lesson plans, and transcripts. Kruse, J. 1988. Classroom activities in thinking skills. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools. Kruse presents over 40 tested activities in critical thinking, creative thinking, problem solving, and decision making. Leeds, D. 2000. The 7 powers of questions: Secrets to successful communication in life and at work. New York: Perigee. This book reveals the seven powers of questions and shows how to use them most effectively to get more out of every professional and personal encounter. Morgan, N. & J. Saxton. (2001). Asking better questions: Models, techniques and classroom activities for engaging students in learning. Markham, Ontario: Pembroke. This guidebook provides tips for modeling questions, lesson plans that emphasize questioning and engage students in learning, and suggestions for using questions to develop knowledge and generate reflection. Presseisen, B. J. 1988. At-risk students and thinking. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools. This text examines students at risk in America's schools, the need for thinking instruction, and implications for practice; includes chapters by national experts. Sousa, D. A. 1988. Questioning strategies for effective teaching. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools. This videotape focuses on developing thinking skills through effective questioning in the classroom and discusses types of questions, strategies for questioning, and how to utilize student responses. Sternberg, R. J. & L. C. Spear-Swerling. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. This book addresses questions such as, What is "good thinking"? Which strategies promote thinking to learn as well as learning to think? Can asking the right questions enhance student thinking? How can teachers prepare for the challenges of teaching for thinking? Lively classroom vignettes, sample classroom activities, and self-study questions are included. SEDL communications associate Leslie Blair is editor of SEDL Letter. You may contact Leslie by email, lblair@sedl.org.
SEDL Letter articles related to the subject: Strengthening Teaching and Learning in the Content Area of Reading and Language: Early Reading
- Ensuring Early Literacy through Coherent Instruction
- Making Every Teacher a Reading Teacher: Putnam City Secondary Educators Work to Help Struggling Readers
- Network for Success
- New Mexico State University Is Up to the Challenge
- Reading Across the Region
- Reading and the Migrant Student
- Resources for Improving Children's Ability to Read
- Sherwood Forest Students are Reading their Way to the Top
- Ten Myths of Reading Instruction
- The Importance of Phonemic Awareness in Learning to Read
- The Reading Success Network: Linking Teachers, Building Community
SEDL products related to the subject: Strengthening Teaching and Learning in the Content Area of Reading and Language: Early Reading
Briefs - Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Phive Phones of Reading
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Phonics Rules
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Reading by Sight
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Regular and Exception Words
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Understanding the Brain and Reading
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: What is Reading? Decoding and the Jabberwocky's Song
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: What Does a Balanced Literacy Approach Mean?
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Reading and the Three Cueing Systems
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Making Sense of Reading
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Methods of Assessing Cognitive Aspects of Early Reading Development
- Topics in Early Reading Coherence: Ten Myths of Reading Instruction
Literature Reviews/Research Syntheses - Reading Assessment Database for Grades K-2
Magazines/Newsletters - Reading First Notebook: The Newsletter for the Reading First Program
- SEDL Letter, Volume XIV, Number 3: Putting Reading First
- SEDL Letter, Volume XIX, Number 2: Reading: Practices to Help Improve Instruction
- SEDL Letter, Volume XVII, Number 1: Reaching Our Reading Goals
- SEDLetter, Volume XI, Number 1: Unlocking the Future: Early Literacy
Professional Development Resources: Guides/Toolkits - Cognitive Foundations of Learning to Read: A Framework
- Glossary of Reading-related Terms
- Literacy Profile Folder: How to Use the Literacy Profile
- Literacy Profile Folder (quantity 20)
Reports - Reading Across the Region
- Reading First Awards Database
Resource Lists - Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level: A Guide to Resources
|