Bell, T. H. (1993). Reflections one decade after A Nation at Risk. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 592-597.

Blank, R. K., & Pechman, E. M. (1995). State curriculum frameworks in mathematics and science: How are they changing across the states? Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Cochran-Smith, M. (1994). The power of teacher research in teacher education. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform: Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 142-165). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in community. In the series, Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 15, 225-237.

Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania (CPRE RR-43).

Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania (CPRE RR-39).

Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (1991, April). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University (CPRE RB-06).

Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (1996). Public policy and school reform: A research summary. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania (CPRE RR-36).

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55 (5), 6-11.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (n.d.). What can policymakers do to support teaching to high standards. CPRE Policy Bulletin. [On-line]. Available: http://www.cpre.org/Publications/Publications.htm (May, 2000).

DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.

Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1-26.

Finley, S. J., Marble, S. T., Copeland, G., & Ferguson, C. (2000, April). Professional development and teachers’ construction of coherent instructional practices: A synthesis of experiences in five sites. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 24-28, 2000.

Finn, C. E., Jr., & Ravitch, D. (1996). Education reform: 1995-1996. [On-line]. Available: http://www.edexcellence.net/library/epctoc.html (May, 2000).

Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1997). Designing state-sponsored teacher networks: A comparison of two cases. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 237-266.

Fuhrman, S. H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 1-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Fullan, M. G. (1996). Turning systemic reform on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 420-423.

Grant, S. G., Peterson, P. L., & Shojgreen-Downer, A. (1996). Learning to teach mathematics in the context of systemic reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33 (2), 509-541.

Hirsch, E., Koppich, J. E., & Knapp, M. S. (1998). What states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: A brief review of current patterns and trends. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Killion, J. (1999). Islands of hope in a sea of dreams: A research report on the eight schools that received the National Award for Model Professional Development. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.

Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67 (2), 227-266.

Koppich, J. E., & Knapp, M. S. (1998). Federal research investment and the improvement of teaching 1980-1997. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2000). Teaching and teacher development: A new synthesis for a new century. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Education in a new era (pp. 47-66). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Little, J. W. (1997). Benchmarks for schools: Excellence in professional development and professional community. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Loveless, T. (1998). The use and misuse of research in educational reform. Brookings Papers on Educational Policy: 1998 (pp. 279-317).

Marble, S. (1997). Narrative visions of schooling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 55-64.

Marzano, R. J. (2000). 20th century advances in instruction. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Education in a new era (pp. 67-95). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R.J., & Kendall, J. S. (1996). A comprehensive guide to designing standards-based districts, schools, and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

McDermott, K. (2000). Barriers to large-scale success of models for urban school reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 22 (1), 83-89.

McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). How the world of students and teachers challenges policy coherence. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. [On-line]. Available at http://www.tc.edu/nctaf/publications/publications.html

Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center for Restructuring Schools. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Schmoker, M., & Marzano, R. J. (2000). Realizing the promise of standards-based education. Educational Leadership, 56 (6), 17-21.

Shulman, L. S. (1999). Forward. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. xi-xiv). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Spielmann, G., & Radnofsky, M. L. (1997). Power structures, change, and the illusion of democracy: A semiotic study of leadership and policy-making. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, March 24-28, 1997 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413 647).

Suleiman, M, & Moore, R. (1996). Teachers’ roles revisited: Beyond classroom management. Paper presented at the Summer Workshop of the Association of Teacher Educators, Tarpon Springs, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 401 277).

Terry, P. M. (1995). Empowerment. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 12 (3), 13-24.

Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform
and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341-375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Tirozzi, G. N., & Uro, G. (1997). Education reform in the United States: National policy in support of local efforts for school improvement. American Psychologist, 52, 241-249.

Wilson, S. M., Peterson, P. L., Ball, D. T., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Learning by all. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 468-476.

Click here to view this publication in the SEDL Catalog.