Warning: Undefined variable $highlight_summary in /var/www/html/web/txcc/our_work/texas_equity_plan/navigation.php on line 29
Warning: Undefined variable $highlight_data in /var/www/html/web/txcc/our_work/texas_equity_plan/navigation.php on line 36
Warning: Undefined variable $highlight_stakeholder in /var/www/html/web/txcc/our_work/texas_equity_plan/navigation.php on line 39
Warning: Undefined variable $highlight_faq in /var/www/html/web/txcc/our_work/texas_equity_plan/navigation.php on line 42
Warning: Undefined variable $highlight_contact in /var/www/html/web/txcc/our_work/texas_equity_plan/navigation.php on line 46
The Plan
Texas Plan for Equitable Distribution of Highly Qualified Teachers
Current Identified Needs
Teacher Experience
Teacher experience data are reported by the Agency in the Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS). Based on 2010-11 data, high-poverty and high- minority campuses have higher rates of beginning (first year) and inexperienced (1-5 years) teachers than other campuses. High-poverty campuses reported 7.2% beginning teachers and 34.4% inexperienced teachers compared to 4.4% beginning teachers and 28.3% inexperienced teachers at low-poverty campuses. High-minority campuses had 6.5% beginning teachers and 34.4% inexperienced teacher while low-minority campuses had 4.3% beginning teachers and 25.5% inexperienced teachers. The table below indicates the breakdown of teacher experience for high- and low-poverty campuses and high- and low-minority campuses.
High-Poverty |
Low-Poverty |
Poverty Inequity |
High-Minority |
Low-Minority |
Minority Inequity |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning |
7.2 |
4.4 |
2.8 |
6.5 |
4.3 |
2.2 |
1-5 Years |
34.4 |
28.3 |
6.1 |
34.4 |
25.5 |
8.9 |
6-10 Years |
20.4 |
22.0 |
1.6 |
21.0 |
19.9 |
1.1 |
11-20 Years |
20.8 |
27.4 |
6.6 |
21.1 |
29.7 |
8.6 |
Over 20 Years |
17.2 |
17.9 |
0.6 |
17.0 |
20.6 |
3.6 |
Source: 2010-11 AEIS Teacher Experience Data.
Out-of-Field Teachers
Statewide, campuses reported a total of 813 teachers on all types of certification permits. Any of these permits could be for a teacher teaching outside his/her field of certification. High-poverty campuses reported 298 teachers (36.65% of total teachers on permits) on permits while low-poverty campuses reported 79 teachers on various permits (9.72% of total teachers on permits). Out-of-field teaching data are also reflected below in the non-highly qualified teacher data, since teaching out-of-field is one of the primary reasons teachers do not meet the highly qualified teacher requirements in a core academic subject area.
Non-Highly Qualified Teachers
Based on 2010-11 highly qualified teacher data, statewide, 0.13% of elementary classes and 0.24% of elementary special education classes were taught by non- highly qualified teachers and 0.47% of secondary classes and 1.12% of secondary special education classes were taught by non-highly qualified teachers. In rank order of highest percentage of non-highly qualified teachers statewide, secondary foreign language classes have the highest percentage of non-highly qualified teachers (1.12%) followed by secondary geography (0.98%), economics (0.60%), science (0.58%), ,mathematics (0.48%), civics and government (0.45%), history (0.38%), reading language arts (0.36%), arts (0.32%), and English (0.16%).
High-poverty elementary schools had 0.14% more elementary classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers than low-poverty elementary schools. On the average, high-poverty secondary schools had 0.41% more secondary core academic subject area classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers than low- poverty secondary schools. The greatest inequity (gap) in secondary classes between high-poverty and low-poverty schools exists in geography classes (1.03%). Other inequities in classes were economics (0.92%), science and reading/language arts (0.59%), mathematics and history (0.52%), art (0.39%), English (0.27%), and civics and government (0.09%). Low-poverty foreign language classes (0.33%) had more classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers than high-poverty.
High-minority elementary schools had 0.13% more elementary classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers than low-minority elementary. On the average, high-minority secondary schools had 0.11% more secondary core academic subject area classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers than low-minority secondary. The greatest inequity (gap) in secondary classes between high-poverty and low-poverty schools exists in economics classes (0.51%). Other inequities in classes were reading/language arts (0.46%), science (0.41%), mathematics (0.16%), arts (0.14%), and history (0.07%). Low-minority foreign language (0.81%), geography (0.37%), and civics and government (0.36%) classes had more classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers than high-minority.
The table below identifies the percentages of classes taught by non-highly qualified teachers.
Statewide Taught by Non-Highly Qualified Teachers |
Low Poverty Taught by Non-Highly Qualified Teachers |
High Poverty Taught by Non-Highly Qualified Teachers |
Inequity Between Low and High Poverty |
Low Minority Taught by Non-Highly Qualified Teachers |
High Minority Taught by Non-Highly Qualified Teachers |
Inequity Between Low and High Minority |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Elementary (one teacher equals one class) |
0.13 |
0.05 |
0.19 |
0.14 |
0.07 |
0.20 |
0.13 |
Total Secondary (one section equals one class) |
0.47 |
0.19 |
0.60 |
0.41 |
0.49 |
0.61 |
0.12 |
English |
0.16 |
0.04 |
0.31 |
0.27 |
0.10 |
0.32 |
0.22 |
Reading/ Language Arts |
0.36 |
0.05 |
0.64 |
0.59 |
0.13 |
0.59 |
0.46 |
Mathematics |
0.48 |
0.12 |
0.64 |
0.52 |
0.38 |
0.54 |
0.16 |
Science |
0.58 |
0.15 |
0.74 |
0.59 |
0.50 |
0.91 |
0.41 |
Foreign Language |
1.12 |
1.18 |
0.85 |
-0.33 |
1.72 |
0.91 |
-0.81 |
Civics/Gov’t |
0.45 |
0.12 |
0.21 |
0.09 |
0.63 |
0.27 |
-0.36 |
Economics |
0.60 |
0.13 |
1.05 |
0.92 |
0.45 |
0.96 |
0.51 |
Arts (Music, Art, Dance, Theater) |
0.32 |
0.06 |
0.45 |
0.39 |
0.32 |
0.46 |
0.14 |
History |
0.38 |
0.08 |
0.60 |
0.52 |
0.42 |
0.49 |
0.07 |
Geography |
0.98 |
0.16 |
1.19 |
1.03 |
1.70 |
1.33 |
-0.37 |
Source: 2010-11 Year-End Highly Qualified Teacher Compliance Report
1. Data and Reporting Systems
Strategies |
Resource |
Status |
---|---|---|
Collect and report data on teacher certification, hiring retention, service, counts, demographics, test passing rates, highly qualified status, and gaps in highly qualified status. |
The State Board for Educator Certification provides a variety of data collections and reporting on hiring, retention, certification, and service. On-line generated reports specific to “who is teaching in Texas” type data are available at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=5033. Studies and formal reports related teacher to turnover, out-of-field teaching, teacher demand, demographics and shortages also are available online at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=5033. |
Implemented |
|
Implemented |
|
|
Implemented |
|
Validate the accuracy of highly qualified teacher data reported by campuses/districts. |
|
Implemented |
2. Teacher Preparation
Strategies |
Resource |
Status |
Target Subject or Group |
---|---|---|---|
Continue Student Loan Forgiveness and Cancellation Opportunities for Teachers. |
Teachers with certain types of student loans may qualify for partial loan forgiveness, deferment, or cancellation benefits. Eligibility for these benefits depends on the type of loan the teacher has, the date of his/her first loan, and whether the teacher serves in a designated low-income school or subject-matter teacher shortage area. Designated low-income schools are those with greater than 30% of enrolled students from low-income families, in districts that are eligible for Title I funds. The Texas Education Agency is required to inform the chief administrative officers at all elementary and secondary schools in the state of the teaching shortage area designations. The following are the Texas designated subject-matter teacher shortage areas for the 2011-2012 school year:
Additional information is available at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/loan.aspx. |
Implemented |
Special Education |
Continue to expand and support high-quality alternative route programs. |
This program is implemented by staff at Education Service Center Region 18. Additional information is available at http://thebestteachintexas.com/index.php. |
Implemented |
All areas |
|
Implemented |
High-poverty schools High-minority schools |
|
|
Implemented | ||
|
|
Proposed |
All teachers |
3. Out of Field Teaching
Strategies |
Resource |
Status |
Target Subject or Group |
---|---|---|---|
Continue Student Loan Forgiveness and Cancellation Opportunities for Teachers. |
Teachers with certain types of student loans may qualify for partial loan forgiveness, deferment, or cancellation benefits. Eligibility for these benefits depends on the type of loan the teacher has, the date of his/her first loan, and whether the teacher serves in a designated low-income school or subject-matter teacher shortage area. Designated low-income schools are those with greater than 30% of enrolled students from low-income families, in districts that are eligible for Title I funds. The Texas Education Agency is required to inform the chief administrative officers at all elementary and secondary schools in the state of the teaching shortage area designations. The following are the Texas designated subject-matter teacher shortage areas for the 2011-2012 school year:
Additional information is available at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/loan.aspx. |
Implemented |
Special Education |
Discourage the hiring of out-of-field teachers in high-poverty, low- performing schools. |
Technical assistance providers will notify school districts with campuses in Title I School Improvement, strongly discouraging the hiring of out-of-field teachers and emphasizing the compliance requirement that all new (to the district) teachers hired on Title I campuses must be highly qualified when hired. |
Implemented |
High-poverty schools |
Continue to expand alternative route programs to allow individuals with relevant training in hardto- fill subjects to enter the profession. |
|
Implemented |
|
|
Implemented |
High-poverty schools High-minority schools |
|
Continue to implement the Memorandum of Understanding between TEA, SBEC, and Spain’s Ministry of Education and Science that enables districts to recruit and hire qualified international teachers. |
The partnership between the Texas Education Agency and the Ministry of Education of Spain began in 1987 with the implementation of the Summer Institutes program, and was validated further with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 1997. Products of this cooperation include a Resource Center for teachers at the University of Houston, summer institutes for Texas teachers held at universities in Spain, a teacher exchange program, a visiting Spanish consultant in Texas, and a number of other educational programs designed to improve and expand the teaching of the Spanish language and culture in Texas, as well as the teaching of the English language and culture in Spain. Hundreds of Spanish and Texas teachers have benefited every year from the richness and quality of these exchange programs. The Texas/Spain Visiting Teacher Program has brought hundreds of teachers to Texas school districts since 1998. This program is implemented by staff at Education Service Center Region 13 since 2010-2011. |
Implemented |
Bilingual/ESL Spanish (Foreign Language) and other subjects |
Disseminate information about other federal, state, or local initiatives intended to reduce outof- field teaching in hardto- staff schools. |
Texas Troops to Teachers (TTT) is a federally funded program designed to assist retiring and separating military veterans to become teachers in their next careers. Texas leads the nation in the number of veterans who have become teachers, with over 2,400 hired since 1996. TTT has become a significant asset for public education as it taps a pool of highly effective, dedicated, mature, and experienced individuals to lead and teach public school students. Additional information is available at http://www.texastroopstoteachers.org. |
Implemented |
|
Continue targeted intensive professional development to out-offield teachers in high- need schools. |
The Texas Teacher Quality Grant Program projects are comprised of an intensive summer component (2-4 weeks) focusing primarily on content and an academic year component blending content and discipline related pedagogy. By statute, project partnerships must include a faculty member from an Arts and Science department or college, a faculty member from an education department or college and a high-needs school district. The LEA must meet the poverty threshold established through census data and also have a high percentage of teachers teaching out of field. Specifically, the Teacher Quality Grants Program provides assistance to help teachers and other staff gain access to professional development, in core academic subjects, that:
This program is implemented by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. |
Implemented |
Mathematics |
4. Recruitment and Retention of Experienced Teachers
Strategies |
Resource |
Status |
Target Subject or Group |
---|---|---|---|
Continue to offer programs to allow LEAs to rehire retired teachers specifically to work in high-need schools. |
In an effort to assist districts in their recruiting and staffing efforts, §824.602 of the Government Code allows retired educators to return to full employment with Teacher Retirement System (TRS) covered employers without experiencing restrictions to, or loss of, benefits as long as certain conditions are met. A key component concerning individuals who retired after January 1, 2001, relates to areas of acute teacher shortage, currently defined as mathematics, science, special education, languages other than English (Foreign Languages), Bilingual/English as a Second Language, and Technology Applications. |
Implemented |
Mathematics |
Continue to offer programs to support new teachers and increase teacher retention. |
As an initiative of the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC), Texas Beginning Educator Support System (TxBESS) is a comprehensive induction program that has proven to be highly effective in retaining Texas teachers. TxBESS began in 1999, and since that time has served approximately 10,000 beginning teachers in over three-hundred school districts. Beginning teachers, teachers new to a district and/or assignment, mentor teachers, principals, district administrators, the Community, and students all benefit from the systemic initiative to support beginning teachers. The standards-based trainings, including mentoring, professional development, and formative assessment are included in a complete kit of training materials for trainers, mentors, principals, district administrators, school board members, campus and district mentor coordinators, and beginning teachers. The research-based program complies with federal requirements in NCLB and focuses on instruction and improving student achievement. It is extremely flexible and can be adapted to meet local needs, including assisting teachers in improving content knowledge and skills. This program is implemented by staff at the 20 Education Service Centers. State funding is not available for this program. |
Implemented |
Inexperienced Teachers |
Improve the quality of instruction to increase teacher retention |
|
Proposed |
All teachers |
|
Proposed |
All teachers |
|
Continue targeted intensive professional development to under prepared teachers. |
The Texas Teacher Quality Grant Program projects are comprised of an intensive summer component (2-4 weeks) focusing primarily on content and an academic year component blending content and discipline-related pedagogy. By statute, project partnerships must include a faculty member from an Arts and Science department or college, a faculty member from an education department or college and a high-needs school district. The LEA must meet the poverty threshold established through census data and also have a high percentage of teachers teaching out of field. Specifically, the Teacher Quality Grants Program provides assistance to help teachers and other staff gain access to professional development, in core academic subjects, that:
This program is implemented by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. |
Implemented |
Mathematics |
Continue professional development in the content areas and pedagogical components for teachers in high-poverty schools. |
Regional ESCs will offer training in content area knowledge and skills as well as pedagogy in the core academic subject areas, focusing on teachers in high-poverty and high-need schools. |
Implemented |
All core |
6. Working Conditions
Strategies |
Resource |
Status |
Target Subject or Group |
---|---|---|---|
Continue to offer programs to allow LEAs to rehire retired teachers specifically to work in high-need schools. |
|
Implemented |
High-poverty schools SIP Schools |
|
|
Implemented |
High-poverty schools SIP Schools |
7. Policy Coherence
Strategies |
Resource |
Status |
Target Subject or Group |
---|---|---|---|
Continue to monitor equitable distribution to ensure that poor or minority children are not taught by inexperienced, unqualified, or out- of-field teachers at higher rates than are other children. |
|
Implemented |
High-poverty schools High-Minority schools |
|
|
Implemented |
All LEAs |
|
Implemented |
All LEAs |
|
Ensure monitoring of LEA equitable distribution of highly qualified teachers. |
TEA will incorporate indicators related to equitable distribution of teachers into the Initial Compliance Review desk audit that is used for determining NCLB compliance and interventions. The indicators will annually review the data reported in the Highly Qualified Teacher Compliance Report comparing high-/low-poverty campuses and high-/low-minority campuses. |
Implemented |
High-Poverty Schools |
For LEAs identified as not meeting the equitable distribution of highly qualified teachers, two processes will be required in the Continuous Improvement Planning process.
|
Implemented |
8. Evaluation Measures to Publicly Report Progress
Measure |
Agency, area, and person(s) responsible forevaluation and reporting |
Resources required |
Means of reporting(e.g., annual report, post on website) |
Timeline |
---|---|---|---|---|
Continue implementation of highly qualified reporting on web site. |
Division of Educator Initiatives, TEA |
None added |
Web Site Posting |
September |
Continue to increase percentages of classes taught by highly qualified teachers. |
Division of Educator Initiatives, TEA |
None added |
Web Site Posting |
September |
Continue to decrease the gap in the percentage of classes taught by highly qualified teachers between low-/high-poverty campuses and low-minority/high-minority campuses. |
Division of Educator Initiatives, TEA |
Professional development and technical assistance to LEAs |
Web Site Posting |
September |
Continue to decrease the gap in percentages of beginning and inexperienced teachers. |
Division of Educator Initiatives, TEA |
Professional development and technical assistance to LEAs |
Web Site Posting |
September |