In Summary

This introduction is intended to describe the scope and intensity of a systemic approach to improvement for increased student achievement. The guide provides materials useful to facilitators who work with schools and districts to achieve this goal. Grounded in research, this approach is not designed as another quick fix that addresses only a single aspect of the educational system. Rather, it provides a process for promoting a culture of continuous inquiry and collaboration, as well as structures and leadership roles that support and sustain both student and staff learning.



  • Bernhardt, V. L. (2004). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
  • Blum, R., & Landis, S. (1998). Scaling up continuous improvement: A case description of Onward to Excellence in Mississippi. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
  • Bossert, S. (1985, May). Effective elementary schools. In R. Kyle (Ed.), Reaching for excellence: An effective schools sourcebook, (pp. 39–53). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Cicchinelli, L. F. (1999). What we know about comprehensive school reform. In Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory (Ed.), Noteworthy perspectives on comprehensive school reform (pp. 1–4). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved August, 2005, from
  • Corallo, C., & McDonald, D. H. (2002). What works with low-performing schools: A review of research. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Education Laboratory (AEL).
  • Cowan, D. F. (2006). Creating learning communities in low-performing sites: A systemic approach to alignment. Journal of School Leadership 16(5), 596–610.
  • Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–23.
  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328–355.
  • Herman, P., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from
  • Huie, S. B., Buttram, J. L., Deviney, F. P., Murphy, K. M., & Ramos, M. A. (2004). Alignment in SEDL's Working Systemically model (Research Report). Austin, TX: SEDL.
  • Jenlink, P. M., Reigeluth, C. M., Carr, A. A., & Nelson, L. M. (1998). Guidelines for facilitating systemic change in school districts. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 217–233.
  • Lezotte, L. W., & Jacoby, B. C. (1992). Sustainable school reform: The district context for school improvement. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products.
  • McDonnell, L. M. (1989, September). Restructuring American schools: The promise and the pitfalls. Paper presented at Education and the Economy: Hard Questions, Hard Answers, a conference sponsored by the Institute on Education and Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
  • Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (2003). Sustaining school improvement (Leadership Folio Series). Aurora, CO: Author.
  • Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2008). Turning around failing schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001, Winter). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 213–227.
  • Sashkin, M., & Egermeier, J. (1993). School change models and processes: A review and synthesis of research and practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.
  • Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL). (2000). Creating knowledge to build high-performing learning communities: A proposal to serve as the regional educational laboratory for the southwestern region. Austin, TX: Author.
  • Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
  • Sparks, D. (2004). Focusing staff development on improving the learning for all students. In G. Cawelti (Ed.), Handbook of research on improving student achievement (3rd ed., pp. 245–255). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
  • Stringfield, S. (1995). Attempts to enhance students' learning: A search for valid programs and highly reliable implementation techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 67–96.
  • Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). School matters: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Thornton, B., Peltier, G., & Perreault, G. (2004). Systems thinking: A skill to improve student thinking. The Clearing House, 77(5), 222–227.